Finally, a European Leader Said Out Loud What All of Them Are Likely Thinking About Trump


Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.
In a little-covered but striking speech last week, the president of Portugal—the centrist leader of a NATO ally—referred to President Donald Trump as “ a Russian asset .”
Is the charge worth taking seriously? Yes, if it's also taken literally.
Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa, the European leader who made the remark at a conclave of Portugal's Social Democratic party, was clear and nuanced about what he meant. He emphasized that he was not calling Trump a Russian “agent,” as some conspiracy theorists have speculated. Rather, he said, “the supreme leader of the world's largest superpower is objectively a Soviet or Russian asset,” in the sense that he “has strategically benefited the Russian Federation” and thus “operates” as a Russian “asset.”
Scholars and denizens of espionage make the same distinction. An agent is a paid and witting spy; he formally, sometimes covertly, works for a foreign government. By contrast, an asset might serve a foreign government without even knowing that he's doing so. This type of asset is sometimes called a dupe or a useful idiot .
De Sousa made his remarks not long after Trump's summit last month with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska , where Putin opposed a ceasefire in Ukraine, and Trump—who had threatened “consequences” unless the meeting produced a ceasefire—did nothing but shrug, smile, and treat the Kremlin dictator with the honor of an eminent world leader.
Many European officials, including senior politicians, were dismayed by Trump's obsequiousness. They have long been alarmed by Trump's unseemly admiration for Putin, his refusal to impose sanctions or other penalties on Russia for its war crimes in Ukraine (even after repeatedly threatening to do so), and his brusque attitude toward alliances, especially those, such as NATO, designed to deter and contain Russian aggression. They had hoped Trump's behavior at a meeting just before the Alaska summit —his tough words about Putin and friendly demeanor toward Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky—might signal a change in policy. But no, Trump remained Trump.
In his speech, delivered Aug. 27, de Sousa proclaimed what many fellow European leaders seem to think, and perhaps whisper in private, but can't say out loud. As long as Ukraine depends on US support for arms and intelligence, and as long as all of Europe depends on US leadership in NATO, they have to keep Trump happy enough to stay in the alliance and not to abandon Ukraine altogether—and that requires publicly thanking him and praising him, and so far, the stratagem has sort of worked.
Other European leaders, notably French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz , have publicly said at times that they can no longer rely on America's security guarantees and thus must provide for the continent's defense on their own. Still, they haven't gone so far as to say that Trump has joined the other side—not in public anyway.
It is worth noting that, like many European presidents, de Sousa is not the head of the country's executive branch (that would be the prime minister, Luís Montenegro), but nor does he hold a purely ceremonial post. Among other roles, he is commander in chief of his country's armed forces. He is also a member of the same Social Democratic party as Montenegro and is a prominent public figure in his own right, having won his elections for two five-year terms by hefty margins .
Meanwhile, how are Trump's hopes of courting Putin working out? If you need proof that sometimes one picture really is worth 1,000 words, check out this week's photo of Putin, Chinese President Xi Jinping, and Indian President Narendra Modi smiling and holding hands at a summit in China, joined later by an equally jolly Kim Jong-un , the dictator of North Korea. (Modi attended with gusto, after Trump imposed a 50 percent tariff on all goods from India, mainly to punish Modi for disputing Trump's claim of credit for ending an India-Pakistan war .)
The summit was the largest meeting ever of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization , which China founded to counter US influence in Asia. Another reason for this meeting, which was attended by more than 20 countries (mainly authoritarian in nature), was to hold a massive military parade celebrating the victory in World War II, for which Xi and Putin claimed joint credit, attempting to write the United States and the rest of the West out of history.
Trump was not pleased. In a long post on social media , he particularly protested (with good reason) Xi's failure to mention “the massive amount of support and 'blood' that the United States of America gave to China in order to help it secure its FREEDOM” in that war. Trump then added:
May President Xi and the wonderful people of China have a great and lasting day of celebration. Please give my warmest regards to Vladimir Putin, and Kim Jong Un, as you conspire against The United States of America.
It's a weird bit of sarcasm. Was Trump pissed that he wasn't invited to the party? Or does the post signal the stirring of a revelation? Xi, Putin, Kim—these are Trump's friends, or so he has long believed. Might he be awakening from a dream that he and the other aspiring strongmen can rule the world together, splitting it up into spheres of influence, like some latter-day Concert of Vienna—that he or the United States (he instinctively regards the two as synonymous) has more in common with them than with the democratic leaders, whom he so often derides with contempt?
One can hope, but it's probably not a safe bet. Trump will emerge from this embarrassment as the same old Trump, as he has before.
