Why Was Karen Attiah Fired After ‘white men’ Post After Charlie Kirk Murder?

• Karen Attiah was fired by the Washington Post over her social media posts criticizing gun violence and racial biases after Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
• The Post accused her of gross misconduct and endangering colleagues, claims she denies as false and unfair.
• Attiah highlighted her firing as part of a wider pattern of diminishing Black voices in media.
• Her posts called out societal absolution for white male violence and questioned performative mourning for white men espousing hate.

Karen Attiah, a longtime Washington Post columnist and the paper’s founding Global Opinions editor, was fired due to her social media posts following the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

Attiah’s posts addressed gun violence, political violence, and racial double standards in America, which the Washington Post management deemed “unacceptable” and “gross misconduct,” accusing her of endangering the physical safety of her colleagues.

Attiah strongly disputed these claims, stating she was dismissed abruptly without any discussion, marking a sharp and contentious end to her tenure at the Post.

Why Karen Attiah Was Fired After the ‘white men’ Post Following Charlie Kirk’s Murder

Karen Attiah was fired primarily for posting critical commentary about gun violence and political violence in the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s assassination. She expressed deep frustration with America’s normalized acceptance of violence and the racial dynamics around it, highlighting the societal tendency to excuse or absolve white men who promote hate or violence.

Her posts on Bluesky included statements that the country “worships violence” and criticized performative mourning for white men who espouse violence. Attiah also directly quoted Kirk to expose his racist remarks towards Black women, linking it to the broader societal and political context of violence and racial bias.

JUST IN: The Washington Post has fired race hustler Karen Attiah. pic.twitter.com/lPKOfHFR8M

— Bad Hombre (@joma_gc) September 15, 2025

The Washington Post’s Stance and Attiah’s Response

According to Attiah, the Washington Post labeled her social media activity as “gross misconduct” and a threat to workplace safety. However, she described the accusations as baseless and a violation of journalistic fairness and principles. Attiah criticized the Post for rushing her firing without conversation or due process.

She also highlighted that her departure represented a broader purge of Black voices in media and other sectors, as she was the last full-time Black opinion columnist at the Post, a significant point in the paper’s evolving editorial direction under new leadership who emphasize conservative views regarding free markets and personal liberties.

Karen Attiah’s social media comments came amid a charged political climate after Kirk’s assassination, combined with a tragic school shooting in Colorado. She addressed wider patterns of violence, racial injustice, and political rhetoric in the US. Attiah emphasized that political violence is intertwined with systemic racial biases, especially the societal absolution extended to white men.

Her critical voice contrasted sharply with mainstream responses that often center on performative sympathy without structural change, a stance that reportedly put her at odds with the Post’s editorial leadership.

Also Read: Is Charlie Kirk Shooter Tyler Robinson Religion Mormon?

Last Updated on September 15, 2025 by 247 News Around The World