The Most Urgent Lesson for Democrats to Take From Trump's DC Deployment

Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.

On Monday, President Donald Trump announced he was placing Washington, DC's police department under direct federal control and deploying the National Guard to patrol the city. Local officials had not asked for it. Within days, troops in fatigues and federal agents in marked jackets were stationed in neighborhoods, helicopters circling overhead, armored vehicles parked within view of the Washington Monument. Mayor Muriel Bowser called it “unsettling and unprecedented.”

The move is typical Trump: a manufactured emergency wrapped in the theater of decisive action. It did not fix the root causes of crime, but it sent an image to millions of Americans that he was the only one willing to act quickly and boldly. Once again, Democrats fell into the trap they have been stumbling into for years. They put a visceral, emotional play with an abstract, data-heavy rebuttal.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer noted the hypocrisy, saying , “For all the talk Republicans give about giving their localities their rights, where are they now?” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries remarked that “the crime scene in DC most damaging to everyday Americans is at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.” Lawmakers from Maryland and Virginia issued a joint statement warning of “the soft launch of authoritarianism.” All of these statements were accurate. None started where most people's minds go first: Am I safe? Is my family safe?

It was the same trap Democrats fell into in 2024, when they pointed to low unemployment, rising wages, and cooling inflation while voters saw grocery prices and rent still climbing. The message that “the numbers are good” landed like a pat on the head. When leaders begin with their own moral vindication instead of the public's lived anxiety, they risk sounding detached or dismissive.

Trump begins where people feel it most. In DC, he started with insecurity, whether grounded in facts or stoked by perception, and met it with the imagery of power: soldiers at intersections, helicopters overhead, agents in tactical gear. The effect is like a firefighter showing up with sirens blaring to a house that is not on fire. The neighbors know the spectacle does not solve the problem, but it still reassures them that someone is willing to move quickly. By placing himself at the center of that drama, he forces everyone else to react on his terms.

That gap between what leaders say and what people feel is where Trump thrives—and it is a gap that could be exploited in other cities just as easily. Chicago, for instance , has been in Trump's rhetorical crosshairs for years—and if this kind of federal takeover can happen in DC, that same playbook can be deployed in any US city after a single high-profile crime.

We have already seen the outlines of that fight. The same day he sent the National Guard into DC, Trump singled out Chicago, a city of more than 2.7 million people, in a press conference, portraying it as a crime-ridden failure and blaming Illinois' elimination of cash bail. “Every place in the country you have no cash lease is a disaster,” Trump said . Illinois made history in 2023 as the first state to abolish cash lease, ending the practice of making pretrial freedom contingent on the ability to pay. A year later, crime rates in Illinois had not risen . Chicago, in particular, has seen a notable drop in crime this year .

In response to Trump's remarks, the office of Mayor Brandon Johnson accused the president of spreading misinformation and issued a strong rebuttal. Johnson's statement rightly pointed out that Trump has been an active obstacle to progress, slashing anti-violence funding while dismantling the federal Office of Gun Violence Prevention and terminating hundreds of millions in grants for community-based safety programs. He argued that if Trump truly wanted to help, he could start by restoring the $158 million cut from violence prevention programs in cities like Chicago.

Johnson is correct that Trump's narrative is built on distortions. But denying that Chicago still has serious public safety challenges is politically shortsighted. Residents in many neighborhoods live with a daily reality that cannot be explained away by statistics alone. Once again, the gap between perception and reality is exactly where Trump thrives. When leaders talk as if incremental progress means the problem is solved, they risk alienating the very people whose trust they most need.

It is politically advantageous for Trump to focus on Chicago. The city embodies, in its framing, everything that is wrong with “Democratic governance”—crime, progressive policies, and an unwillingness to “get tough.” It is an easy target for the imagery he knows plays on national television: soldiers on corners, armored vehicles rolling past landmarks, a mayor cast as too weak to keep his own residents safe.

The truth is that Trump is wrong about what makes cities safer, and he is wrong about the effects of ending cash lease. But being right on the facts is not enough. Chicago must lead with the conditions people live in every day—whether they feel safe at the bus stop, whether their kids have after-school options, whether there is steady work and affordable housing, whether the block feels cared for. These conditions are what make people trust that their government is keeping them safe.

A more effective Democratic response would begin with recognition: “We hear you. Too many families do not feel safe walking home. Safety is a right, not a privilege.” Then pivot to the real levers of safety, which include more detectives to solve violent crimes, better lighting and safe transit, mental health crisis teams, stable housing, strong youth programs, and a safety net that reduces the desperation that drives violence. Crime falls fastest and stays down longest when material conditions improve and people trust that their community has their back.